IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF WILLIAM G. BRATTON, Ward, ROBERT E. BRATTON, Appellant (Petitioner),
JEANNE BLENKINSOP, Appellee (Respondent)
Appeal from the District Court of Park County. The Honorable Steven R. Cranfill, Judge.
Representing Appellant: Pro se.
Representing Appellee: Mary H. Reed, McCarty, Reed and Earhart, Attorneys at Law, LC, Cody, Wyoming.
Guardian Ad Litem: Dawn R. Scott, Attorney at Law, Cody, Wyoming.
Before BURKE, C.J., and HILL, KITE, DAVIS, and FOX, JJ.
BURKE, Chief Justice.
[¶1] Appellant, Robert E. Bratton, acting pro se, challenges the district court's order transferring funds into a conservatorship account held for the benefit of the parties' brother. The funds had previously been transferred by Mr. Bratton from an account held jointly with his sister, Jeanne Blenkinsop, Appellee, to an account held individually by Mr. Bratton. He also contends the district court deprived him of due process by vacating a hearing on Ms. Blenkinsop's motion to release funds, and that the district court lacked authority to rule on the motion. We affirm.
[¶2] Mr. Bratton presents four issues, which we combine and rephrase as follows:
1. Whether the district court erred by granting Ms. Blenkinsop's motion to release funds.
2. Whether the district court erred by vacating the initially scheduled hearing on Ms. Blenkinsop's motion to release funds.
3. Whether the district court had authority to rule on Ms. Blenkinsop's ...