Order Affirming the District Court's " Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence"
E. JAMES BURKE, Chief Justice.
[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that Appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge the district court's August 14, 2014, " Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence." In that order, the district court revoked Appellant's probation and imposed a sentence of four to six years on Appellant's conviction for felony driving while under the influence of alcohol. On November 7, 2014, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a " Motion to Withdraw as Counsel," pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the " Anders brief" submitted by appellate counsel, this Court, on December 2, 2014, entered its " Order Granting Permission for Court-Appointed Counsel to Withdraw." That Order notified Appellant that the district court's " Order Revoking Probation and Imposing
Sentence" would be affirmed unless, on or before January 20, 2015, Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not frivolous. Now, taking note that Appellant, Steven Elliot Richardson, has not filed a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court's " Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence" should be affirmed. It is, therefore,
[¶2] ORDERED that the district court's August 14, 2014, " Order Revoking Probation and Imposing Sentence" be, and the same hereby ...