Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Michael Scott Carroll v. the State of Wyoming

August 10, 2011

MICHAEL SCOTT CARROLL, APPELLANT (DEFENDANT),
v.
THE STATE OF WYOMING, APPELLEE (PLAINTIFF).



The opinion of the court was delivered by: Marilyn S. Kite Chief Justice

O RDER A FFIRMING THE D ISTRICT C COURT' S "O RDER R EVOKING P ROBATION AND J UDGMENT AND S ENTENCE"

[¶1] This matter came before the Court upon its own motion following notification that appellant has not filed a pro se brief within the time allotted by this Court. In 2009, Appellant pled guilty to one count of sexual abuse of a minor in the third degree. Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 6-2-316(a)(i). The district court imposed a sentence of two to three years, which was suspended in favor of seven years of supervised probation. In 2010, the district court revoked Appellant's probation and imposed the underlying sentence. The "Order Revoking Probation and Judgment and Sentence" was entered on December 28, 2010. Appellant filed this appeal to challenge that order. On May 16, 2011, Appellant's court-appointed appellate counsel filed a "Motion to Withdraw as Counsel," pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 744, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 1400, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Following a careful review of the record and the "Anders brief" submitted by appellate counsel, this Court, on June 7, 2011, entered its "Order Granting Permission for Court Appointed Counsel to Withdraw." That Order notified Appellant that the district court's December 28, 2010, "Order Revoking Probation and Judgment and Sentence" would be affirmed unless, on or before July 25, 2011, Appellant filed a brief that persuaded this Court that the captioned appeal is not wholly frivolous. Taking note that Appellant, Michael Scott Carroll, has not filed a brief or other pleading within the time allotted, the Court finds that the district court's "Order Revoking Probation and Judgment and Sentence" should be affirmed. It is, therefore,

[¶2] ORDERED that the district court's December 28, 2010, "Order Revoking Probation and Judgment and Sentence" be, and the same hereby is, affirmed.

[¶3] DATED this August 10, 2011.

BY THE COURT:

20110810

© 1992-2011 VersusLaw ...

Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.