Searching over 5,500,000 cases.


searching
Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.

Order List

June 29, 2001

ZALAWADIA, JAYSUKH
v.
ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.



ORDERLIST

(ORDER LIST: 533 U.S.)

CERTIORARI -- SUMMARY DISPOSITION

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-285 McQUEEN, SAM B. V. SC DEPT. OF HEALTH, ETC.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Supreme Court of South Carolina for further consideration in light of Palazzolo v. Rhode Island, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-523 OBAJULUWA, EMANUEL V. ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-668 INS V. KHORN, YOUR

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-750 INS V. SRIMENAGSAM, SOUNBOON

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-751 INS V. MOUNSAVENG, OUDONE

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-752 FASANO, DIST. DIR., INS V. PHAN, MINH N.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-768 INS V. NGUYEN, NAM

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-769 INS V. CHHUN, KANGKIRI

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-777 ASHCROFT, ATTY. GENERAL V. LIM, DAREN

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zavdydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-985 INS V. TRAN, THANH D.

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-986 INS V. PHETSANY, DETNAKONE

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-987 INS V. OURK, SAROEUT

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-1000 INS V. NGUYEN, BE HUU

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-1001 INS V. LE, PHUONG PHUC

The motion of respondent for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of Zadvydas v. Davis, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-1136 NIXON, ATT'Y GEN. OF MO V. MO REPUBLICAN PARTY, ET AL.

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit for further consideration in light of Federal Election Comm'n v. Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Comm., 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-1300 DODGE, DOUGLAS P. V. GRAVILLE, KATHRYN L., ET VIR

The motion of AARP for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division One, for further consideration in light of Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (2000).

00-1327 FASANO, DIST. DIR., INS V. RICHARDS-DIAZ, MARIO

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-5970 RUSSELL, LANFORD V. ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

00-6280 MAX-GEORGE, PRINCE D. V. ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for a writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit for further consideration in light of INS v. St. Cyr, 533 U.S. ___ (2001).

ORDERS IN PENDING CASES

00M99 HUNTER, ERNEST, ET UX. V. CIR

00M101 BRUETMAN, MARTIN E. V. HERBSTEIN, DEIGO, J.

The motions to direct the Clerk to file petitions for writs of certiorari out-of-time are denied.

00M100 LEAK, VAN QUINTON V. UNITED STATES

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis without an affidavit of indigency executed by petitioner is denied.

65, ORIG. TEXAS V. NEW MEXICO

The motion of the River Master for fees and expenses is granted, and the River Master is granted a total of $2,645.00 for the period January 1 - March 31, 2001, to be paid equally by the parties.

99-1996 J.E.M. AG SUPPLY, ET AL. V. PIONEER HI-BRED INTL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

00-511 VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS V. FCC, ET AL.

00-555 WORLDCOM, INC., ET AL. V. VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS

00-587 FCC, ET AL. V. IOWA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.

00-590 AT&T CORP. V. IOWA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.

00-602 GEN. COMMUNICATIONS, INC. V. IOWA UTILITIES BD., ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument is granted. The motion of BellSouth Corporation, et al., for additional time for oral argument is granted. Thirty additional minutes are allotted for that purpose to be divided as follows: 45 minutes for petitioners in No. 00-511, 15 minutes for petitioners in Nos. 00-555 and 00-590, and 30 minutes for the Solicitor General. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

00-568 NEW YORK, ET AL. V. FERC, ET AL.

00-809 ENRON POWER MARKETING, INC. V. FERC, ET AL.

The motion of Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The motion of the Solicitor General for additional time for oral argument and for divided argument is granted and ten additional minutes are allotted for oral argument to be divided as follows: 20 minutes for petitioners in No. 00-568, 20 minutes for petitioner in No. 00-809, and 30 minutes for the Solicitor General. The request for divided rebuttal is denied.

00-730 ADARAND CONSTRUCTORS, INC. V. MINETA, SEC. OF TRANSP.

The motion of petitioner to dispense with printing the joint appendix is granted.

00-832 NATL. CABLE & TELECOMM. ASSN V. GULF POWER CO., ET AL.

00-843 FCC, ET AL. V. GULF POWER CO., ET AL.

The motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument is granted. Justice O'Connor took no part in the consideration or decision of this motion.

00-860 CORRECTIONAL SERVICES CORP. V. MALESKO, JOHN E.

00-1045 TRW INC. V. ANDREWS, ADELAIDE

The motions of the Solicitor General for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for divided argument are granted.

00-1519 UNITED STATES V. ARVIZU, RALPH

The motion for appointment of counsel is granted and it is ordered that Victoria A. Brambl, Esq., of Tucson, Arizona, is appointed to serve as counsel for the respondent in this case.

00-1692 WETLANDS ACTION NETWORK V. U.S. ARMY CORPS OF ENGINEERS

(00A1064)

The application for stay addressed to Justice Breyer and referred to the Court is denied.

00-8898 STEELE, JONATHAN V. ORANGE COUNTY, ET AL.

The motion of petitioner for reconsideration of order denying leave to proceed in forma pauperis is denied.

00-9726 SWOYER, THOMAS C. V. EDGARS, MR., ET AL.

00-9804 FOOTLAND, LENARD A. V. EVANS, SEC. OF COMMERCE

The motions of petitioners for leave to proceed in forma pauperis are denied. Petitioners are allowed until July 20, 2001, within which to pay the docketing fees required by Rule 38(a) and to submit petitions in compliance with Rule 33.1 of the Rules of this Court.

CERTIORARI GRANTED

00-1021 RUSH PRUDENTIAL HMO, INC. V. MORAN, DEBRA, ET AL.

The motion of National Association of Insurance Commissioners for leave to file a brief as amicus curiae is granted. The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted.

00-1167 TAHOE-SIERRA PRESERVATION V. TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING

The petition for a writ of certiorari is granted limited to the following question: "Whether the Court of Appeals properly determined that a temporary moratorium on land development does not constitute a taking of property requiring compensation under the Takings Clause of the United States Constitution?"

CERTIORARI DENIED

99-9786 MENDIVIA, ISRAEL P. V. UNITED STATES

00-362 GALINDO DEL VALLE, FERNANDO V. ASHCROFT, ATTY. GEN., ET AL.

00-753 RODRIGUEZ, CARMELO J. vs. INS

00-962 ASHCROFT, ATTORNEY GENERAL V. MAHADEO, SOONDAR

00-1318 LOCAL 134 IBEW, ET AL. V. CHATHAS, CHARLES, ET AL.

00-1372 BONEY, JERMAINE V. UNITED STATES

00-1470 RELFORD, ROBERT, ET AL. V. LEXINGTON-FAYETTE URBAN CTY.

00-1488 AR DEPT. OF ED. vs. JIM C., ET AL.

00-1496 BROWN, MICHAEL J. V. DEPT. OF NAVY

00-1499 AUGUSTUS, ANTONIO, ET AL. V. SURFACE TRANS. BD., ET AL.

00-1500 MENDIOLA, JULIO V. SCHOMIG, WARDEN

00-1507 DEPT. OF JUSTICE V. MAYDAK, KEITH

00-1539 MOORE, SAMUEL D., ET AL. V. AFTRA HEALTH & RET. FUNDS

00-1552 PEZOLD, RICHEY, CARUSO, ETC. V. CHEROKEE NATION

00-1560 GENTILE, JOSEPH, ET UX. V. QUAKER OATS CO.

00-1563 BEVERLY CA CORP. V. NLRB

00-1568 DIETELBACH, SHIRLEY V. OHIO EDISON COMPANY

00-1582 ARCADIS GERAGHTY & MILLER V. CONOCO ...


Buy This Entire Record For $7.95

Download the entire decision to receive the complete text, official citation,
docket number, dissents and concurrences, and footnotes for this case.

Learn more about what you receive with purchase of this case.